i don't like the options.
i chose "be raised in some way" but really my opinion is "be raised in some way carefully and gradually with emphasis on security over cheap fees"
right
~80% of users think it should be raised in some way, i think we can all agree that at the very least it could be raised
carefully and gradually~20% of users think "stay the same for now", which seems to indacte that they will vote "should be raised in some way" given some time or the right conditions full blocks >80% of blocks?
It's good to see 0% think it should never be increased
It's not suprising at all. The critical point is not if, but how much and in which way.
I'm for block size increases as well, provided that decentralization is not hurt. Because without a healthy, decentralized network Bitcoin is worth zero. Therefore I'm strongly opposing BIP101, because it is an extremist position that does not care about decentralization at all.
Successfully scaling Bitcoin requires an upper layer that reduces data load on the blockchain in addition to small increases to maximum block size.
ya.ya.yo!