Actually, dyask, I believe the 6TH observation came at the point scrypt.cc had switched from 'khs' to 'mhs' but seemingly hadn't adjusted the figures being displayed on the market listings yet.
So, yeah, your whole obsession about trying to minimise, downplay and generally distract from the ongoing fraud with wildly speculative assertions about how 'most' btc had been withdrawn already, as though you have any fucking idea where those btc were sent, is getting really tiresome and painting you more and more as being either socially autistic or a shill trying to downplay the the size of the criminal scam which is still in operation.
So, yeah, your whole obsession about trying to minimise, downplay and generally distract from the ongoing fraud with wildly speculative assertions about how 'most' btc had been withdrawn already, as though you have any fucking idea where those btc were sent, is getting really tiresome and painting you more and more as being either socially autistic or a shill trying to downplay the the size of the criminal scam which is still in operation.
The could be the source of the 6 THs. It simply isn't a valid point to be using.
I haven't downplayed anything. I simply don't share the same views. I find your use of vulgar language and insults to be also tiresome.
As far as scams go, scrypt.cc is really small compared to LTCgear, GAW or Mt.Gox. That doesn't mean that someone wasn't hurt a lot worse at scrypt.cc than others by those scams. However what is going on is the people on the extreme end of the scam scale are unhappy with anyone not as extreme as them. Since the "hack", scrypt.cc has been a complete scam and I haven't said it is legit. Pretty amazing how much I'm attacked just because I don't suck up the scam police.
