1. Any exchange can pickup the wallet and open a market any time they want.
2. Gliss does not give us any special treatment in fact we have had to make many adjustments to ensure transparency. I think a lot of people misunderstand what a market cap actually is.
3. We try not to but we put a lot of blood, sweat, tears, and cash out so it stings a bit when people yell scam and take statements out of context.
4. We do not manipulate anything, we do have pricing limits which I understand can be frustrating but please see #1.
If anyone would like me to answer any questions personally please hit me up on skype (
info@atomic-trade.com) or feel free to text or call me 1-609-389-4306 (EST USA).
Mark. Can you not see how keeping banx in just your exchange appears to be some form of manipulation?
Also, how much did you bribe Gliss at coinmarketcap to keep your centralized asset in the top 10.
Maybe you shouldnt take our criticism as anything personal. After the whole mt gox fiasco it should be understood that things that feel fishy will make our hair bristle.
Allow proper trading of your asset without the actions that are seen as manipulative and then well talk
Great work here. Thank you for posting.
I think most people could see it was fairly obvious that it was basically scam/medium to long term con-job from the start. But there are a lot of people in this scene who often get taken advantage of and having a specific post like this where you point everything out is very useful and will hopefully save people some money.
Was really surprised that Bitshares was willing to associate with them. Shocked actually. It's one thing to have an open platform where anyone can use it, but it's another to publicly associate with something like this. Bitshares marketing constantly leaves me scratching my head wondering what they are thinking.
As a relatively long time BitShares community member, I do not remotely trust BanxShares. If it is a scam, I don't know why they'd move it onto an open platform they do not control, but I guess we can wait and see what they do with it. Anything they do to manipulate their token supply will be more transparent than it is now. It's not like we can stop them from using our chain since it is an open platform.
As for public association between BitShares and BanxShares, BitShares has historically had great technology/developers and horrible marketing. More people and businesses are just now beginning to seriously notice BitShares, and I think BitShares marketers are thrilled to announce any business endorsing the BitShares chain as a superior platform and moving onto it. I agree they should be more careful not to let that come across as endorsement of anything they have no reason to believe is legitimate.
I have resisted replying to any part of this thread up until now. And my policy of responding to trolls posting total inaccuracies and many quotes out of context will remain the same. I don't respond to them.
But I would like to address your specific post. I would like to say that we are always looking for ways to build more transparency to ease the healthy skepticism that this community has toward almost every competing asset. So our forthcoming move to BitShares helps to address that essential trust issue by making our every move more auditable.