Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Wardrick account hacked---trust abuse resolution in sight (finally)
by
tspacepilot
on 17/09/2015, 20:25:19 UTC
Putting a negative feedback and explicitly saying you're never going to remove it - regardless of any future events - is questionable to some though.
TSP has not made a single factual argument as to why the negative rating(s) he has are inappropriate,

Here are couple of arguments, I'm sure you'll just ignore them though, so maybe this is for the benefit of others:

1) I never scammed anyone.
2) I have a long history of not causing problems
3) All of my negative ratings are from you (and your sockpuppets) and tradefortress
4) Tradefortress is a known scammer and liar
5) Looks like you are too!
1) you scammed coinchat for ~.5BTC
You've never come up with any evidence of this.  And I don't have any evidence of it either (because it didn't happen).  This is where someone is supposed to say "proof or gtfo".
Quote
2) except when someone calls you out as a scammer, then you sling mud at them, harass them and stalk them until you can find something even remotely negative, even if it is based on bogus evidence.
If you mean when someone falsely accuses me that I stand up for myself, then okay.  You were the one who kept bringing your alts and sockpuppets into this. If you hadn't been sockpuppeting with panthers52, I would have never uncovered your escrow scam.
Quote
3) no. You have a negative rating from at least one other person then myself and TF
It's not clear that TF wasn't controlling that Wardrick account.  But it's nice of you to finally admit to all of your sockpuppet ratings.
Quote
4) okay. What is your point.
The point is the that the kind of sources you're relying on are known to be completely untrustworthy.
Quote
5) nope.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171059.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1174622.0


I think we're done here.