anyone investing in scrypt.cc this year had to be aware of the extreme risks.
What existed in April is no longer the case is it? My position was that GHx was very risky to hold long term because of the cost of it the poor liquidity of it (at least my view of liquidity). You took something out of context to tried and twist it into support for scrypt.cc ...
So which is it? Anyone had to be aware of the the EXTREME risks? Or the risks weren't so EXTREME back in April but it's no longer the case? Do you really not see the contradiction, or do you expect others to not see the contradiction?
And spare me the "out of context" excuse. This was just one out of many, many, many posts you made back then on that specific subject. Of course I can't post everything here. Anyone is encouraged to visit the link I provided and find out. You even have your own thread on scrypt.cc vs GHX and Hashnest:
https://forum.gethashing.com/t/dykasks-scryptcc-vs-ghx-comparison-thread/4469
Here is one more example, AFTER the "hack" you're still not admitting you were totally wrong about scrypt.cc risks:
https://forum.gethashing.com/t/ponzi-scrypt-cc-shorted-payouts-missing-mh-the-lot/1761/798