Re: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud)
Increase the block size and if Core takes to long to do it then an alternative implementation of Bitcoin will.
"IF?" "IF?" "IF?"
From where did this wild "IF" suddenly appear?
All summer long, you Gavinistas were screaming that Core has already taken too long, and as a result Bitcoin is (for the greater profit of Blockstream) choking and dying, thus justifying hearn@sigint.google.mil and gavin@tla.mit.gov's governance coup.
Now that XT got fukkin' rekt, you want to backpedal to a conditional hedge?
There is no conditional hedge. Bitcoin is moving forward with bigger blocks, whether you like it or not.
1. Bitcoin is not moving forward with bigger blocks anytime soon.
blah blah blah....
2. None of those options reflect well on you, and all are in line with our expectation that Hearn's fanboys will seek to mislead the public.
1. Wrong. This is going to happen, whether you are happy about it or not.
2. They dont go around openly advocating dDos attacks, the MPfag tactic du jour.