May I remind you that pirateat40 also had stellar reputation over multiple months before his theft. He also had fairly big depositors. He also had supporters, people just like you, ardently arguing that pirateat40 always paid, and that, therefore, there is no way he was going to turn out to be a fraudster.

The rest is history.

My guess is, based on your broken logic, you would have supported pirateat40 as well at the time, am I right? Think about that very deeply. And try to understand why your logic is broken.

Bottom line, there is no free money. 1.5% weekly == 117% yearly. There is almost no way Vescudero is legit, especially when his operations match almost all the Ponzi red flags established by the US SEC, which I keep quoting again and again: http://www.sec.gov/answers/ponzi.htm

I was right about pirateat40. I will be right about Vescudero again. Gullible investors will continue to lose their coins