I think Armstrong is wrong in all of his formulas.
I dont know how to get you to understand that tomorrow impedes the today from ever happing with thought having to first remember the future past thing you were thinking about when talking about the thing to were supposed to say when you never said it. This has the disparency of never acting the way we said we were going to do we did, except weve already done it and now we are re-enacting in a way that should never have been.
Does that make sense?
Ah! The voice of reason! Congratulations sir, you're spot on! Either you understand the above quote or you blindly fall for Armstrong predictions. Let me clarify
ONCE MORE that I don't berate the guy, nor I say that EVERYTHING he predicts is bogus. His model may be very well designed but IMHO falls into the
initial conditions of deterministic chaos tampering error, which is broadly discussed
here.
There's a GREAT possibility that (IF I'm right) somebody has been following his prediction model so that he alters accordingly the initial conditions of the deterministic chaos that M. Armstrong predicted. I don't expect anyone to follow my thinking regarding this, and CERTAINLY, don't claim the infallible. But, please keep in mind that (IF I'm right) we're talking about a
dynamic deterministic chaos system here. And we want to predict what will happen!
Yeah, good luck with that if you have somebody tampering with it all the time because he reads what you calculated...