Fine, I'm embellishing, but your position was still that you disagree with it, ergo it cannot be.  With a few tweaks and a less aggressive increase, this discussion could have been resolved by now.



If you think I've only caught on to the idea of a dynamic blocksize just now, then apparently you're still too busy blindly labeling me a militant XT supporter to recognise that people aren't just looking at one possible solution.  

Hell, if you were really paying close attention, you might notice I made the post immediately after your post in upal's thread (pre-BIP-number-allocation at the time).  Cheers for the slightly late welcome anyway, though, you sarcastic prick.  

So if we're quite finished exchanging pleasantries, let's move on.  You shouldn't need much time to read it, as it's basically just upal's excellent proposal with some tweaks from juiceayres later in that same thread and now me combining it with a hint of BIP100-style voting to balance it out a smidgen.