Another NoKoin Strategic Plan Inconsistency 
Also note that given the foundations' continual coin distribution, by year three they will no longer own a majority if the coins, and by year 10 they will own less than 5 percent of the coin supply.
vs.
Foundation coin holdings are projected to peak around year five, then decline slowly and ultimately stabilize at under 5 percent of the total supply.

I saw that.
They might be explaining it from 2 different angles?
I don't know, it's not clear as usual.
a. a majority of all coins
b. total number of coin foundation ever owned
(probably not, but they could argue this?)
However, I suspect the founders 300m coin for work after launch is the key to this more recent information,
"by year three they will no longer own a majority of the coins,"
These 300m coin are "set aside" at launch, but still count toward foundation total of 2.4bn.
Ok, so the foundation technically control them (which is why neucoin project say foundations have 2.4bn coin, not 2.1bn that they can actually use/stake)
After year 1, foundation will hold 600m founders coin, (after releasing over 100m) a "false 600m" holding
After 3 years the remaining balance of these coin is paid in full to the founders. (see strategic plan) The balance will still be around 600m neucoin
(using my figures as explained in previous post. 850m+ already released. no official equation for this exist)
This "final release" to founders will swing the balance of foundation controlled coin to "less than 50% of all neucoin"
A swing of effectively 1.2bn neucoin
(if the final payment is much less it will be because higher rewards have already been taken. same sort of affect.)
neucoin haven't shown a real set of figures for founders 3 year release
(Just some crappy 2 month example of 1m neucoin, based on the 5 year release plan. not relevant here)
"Illustration of how the re-sale restrictions work in practice"
http://forum.neucoin.org/t/how-the-neucoin-community-can-monitor-the-foundations-and-teams-neucoin-token-holdings-over-time/1526Based on that, my figures are conservative. I think.
No consistency here, no transparency here.
Just confusion, deflection, resignation.
