I liked the original BIP106 for it's direction, I never stated I preferred it absolutely (and was careful to express myself that way, you should know that if you've been researching my post history thoroughly).
You're just relaying things I did not say, yet again, in order to "win". I'm not arguing with you, or anyone else for that matter. That's why I'm not making personal attacks or misrepresenting people's views as a strategy (which appears to be all you are capable of). It works to soothe the ego, but anyone observing will recognise what I am saying.
I am arguing about the actual issues, but if you attempt use subversive tactics, I will call you out. And it will do your reputation no good to continue trying to use these underhanded arguments. May I suggest that you stop doing it.
Fair enough. So back to the issue, is this amendment an improvement over the original or not? That's all I'm really looking for out of all this. Is it at least a step in the right direction?
You're being conciliatory, so I will read your idea through. When I said I didn't have time though, I actually meant that, so I can't answer you meaningfully right now, but I will take a look at it and respond.