XMR/AEON Developer Smooth Investigation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1151565.0
Thank you for your support.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1151565.0
Thank you for your support.
Don`t make me believe that spamming is the only thing VNL dev can do.
Instead of producing substantial arguments in your coin`s favor, you begin spamming?
I don't believe that false accusations are the only thing other devs can do... They can't code zero time that's for sure.
You can accuse anyone for anything. That's why we have courts to prove that someone is guilty. If you are certain that he broke the law then go and inform the police... What are you waiting for... oh wait
I agree - if a law has been broken (you haven't even established in which jurisdiction yet?) then you should report it to the police or engage a lawyer for a professional opinion.
In fact I will report it to the bitcoin police on reddit for you
The legality of it doesn't really matter. In the open source, free software community, this type of behavior is incredibly immoral. It's not a fucking free for all, there are community standards to be upheld from an ethics standpoint.
The simple fact that john-connor claimed to have written the entire Vanillacoin source from scratch means he has committed fraud. Why you would trust a developer like this is beyond me. Regardless of his ability to develop software, his inability to engage in ethical practices is a huge red flag.
Yet he has already built a following of sheep trying to ride his coattail to monetary gain.
Yeaah, now legality doesn't matter. So what matters more? If he commited a fraud(fraud is illegal, but it doesn't matter?) as you claim, you should report it. If my competitors would stole intellectual property and took my market share I would fight against it. But not by hanging a large banner "company x is stealing intellectual property" on my own company's headquarters like xmr and other devs are doing(you can go to jail for something like this). It's plain stupid, trolling, or unfair competition what you are doing. You can't prove shit, but you are still attacking.
Someone is stealing money from the bank, I'm going to post on his facebook that he is a thief but I'm not going to call the police because he wasn't stealing. Fuck logic
What I am doing? I'm arguing my opinion which has factual merit. I don't need to report any activity to any authority in order for my arguments to be valid and strong.
I can write here that you are a liar, my opinion has factual merit, because you are lying that John stole bitcoin's code. You are wrong, your arguments are not strong and valid. Anyone can write whatever he wants. It really takes a lot more to prove that someone stole code than stupid post on bitcointalk... You seem to not understand that simple fact.