I am not sure why do you call my serious questions and observations a FUD. Am I who manipulate price? Am I who keep BIDs so thin? Am I who made lat github commit in March? Am I who launch yet-another-IPO scam every two months? And many, many more.
I don't care about Mastertrader777 much, the fact is I have lost a money in this scam so I can't sham nothing has happened and this coin is legit. It is not.
Shills like you tries to legitimize this scam. This is bad.
BTW I have asked for "Hacked Bittrex story" in Bittrex thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=463202.msg12479165#msg12479165Let's see if mastertrader777 tells truth.
I'm answering this on this thread and not on our main one since this is coin specific.
Your question doesn't make sense. If your question is, is Bittrex vulnerable to a double spend attack? The answer is yes. Anything that relies on blockchains are vulnerable when a fork happens. Was Bittrex hacked? No.
richie@bittrex
Also all the time here mastertrader777 claims that network is safe, it simply hung what can be fixed by resync of blockchain. He made no single word about successful double spend attack that was made. We did not know about double spend, instead we have been told that it was "an exchange attack not so much network attack". That's why my question made sense from that point of view.
Now we when we know about successful double spend things are clear. MTR network is not safe.