Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: So What now? ฿itcoin is dead? READ
by
SebastianJu
on 21/09/2015, 21:48:30 UTC
If we bitcoin remains as is, soon transactions could take up to 1 hour to confirm, meaning bitcoin will become a useless micro payment tool..

But if we choose to increase the block size bitcoin will become more centralized?

So whats the solution?

My take on it is that bitcoin should remain as is, meaning the block sizes should remain the same, and transaction confirmation time is not an issue, since bitcoin was never intended to be a quickest way to send, decentralization was the main goal, lets not forget that.
So bitcoin transactions taking hours to be confirmed is nto an issue, bitcoin is the gold of the crypto world, other alt coins that are quicker to use an more practical for micro payment situations will emerge, but bitcoin should remain as the back bone of crypto currency.

Yes quick confirmation is essential for micro payments, like buying something at a store, you don't want to wait an hour to wait until the payment is confirmed. But bitcoin is not only used for micro payments, some people use bitcoin to send money over seas, as seen with cyprus and greece, sending millions or even billions of dollars any where around the world in a number of hours doesn't sound so bad does it?

So in my opinion bitcoin should be left untouched, soon new alt coins will fill in the void space beneath bitcoin and will complete the crypto world.

What's the sense of bitcoin when it is slow? Bitcoin has only a couple of advantages and you think it makes sense to take an essential one out? Only because there are usecases where you can wait some hours does not mean that the majority of the transactions are time sensitive. Bitcoin would simply be useless when you can't trust into a timely confirmation.

There is simply no good reason to cripple bitcoin artificially with 1 megabyte blocks.