@iCEBREAKER
That "code thief" single handedly coded more and with a higher quality than your beloved XMR developers, who couldn't put down anything on the table since the moment they forked bytecoin.
Must hurt to baghold something that will never get real world use or adoption with those "developers".
That "code thief" single handedly coded more and with a higher quality than your beloved XMR developers, who couldn't put down anything on the table since the moment they forked bytecoin.
Must hurt to baghold something that will never get real world use or adoption with those "developers".
Your scam coin is based on provably stolen code. Even worse, your scam-dev denies stealing the code despite being caught red-handed, dead to rights. Worst of all, your scam-community uses Scientology style 'attack-the-attackers' tactics to deflect criticism with logical fallacies and flat out lies about whatever projects the 'attackers' happen to be involved in. It's basically the low rent version of the DashHole cargo cult.
Gmaxwell proves 'VNL stole code?' Attack Bitcoin!
Smooth proves 'VNL stole code?' Attack Monero!
gjhiggins proves 'VNL stole code?' Quick, attack C-CEX like anyone knows or cares WTF a C-CEX is/was!
All your scam-dev can do is steal code and hide the theft using the advanced technique of 'variable renaming.'
OTOH, XMR devs are doing great things to salvage, improve, and perfect their inherited Cryptonote codebase.