Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud)
by
coalitionfor8mb
on 25/09/2015, 20:11:26 UTC
Changing the protocol rules is identical to a relatively rare and discreet transition stages that any star undergoes in order to find a new balance point, when the old one no longer serves its accumulated mass. That's when the block size limit needs to be raised. The new limit needs to resonate with the whole ecosystem as it's supposed to represent the interests of the whole. It needs to preserve enough mass in the outer shell (users and validators), but leave enough space and entropy for internal competition (businesses and miners) to continue to produce goods with higher energy levels than before.

Taking this analogy further...

We can observe that the energy levels (or stress-tests) in the core have risen
and the outer shell (of full nodes) is being challenged having hard time holding up (at home).

It's definitely not the right time to increase the energy level even further (raising the block limit),
but on the contrary a time to invite more full nodes to be able to sustain the reaction.

Any non-consensual fork at this level might result in the Coronal Mass Ejection (or CME) type of event
and can be viewed as another "Fly, You Fools" situation. Grin