Arguable. Emunie doesn't have the delegates system you have, but is truly and fully decentralized.
It's depends from that you mean under
fully decentralized, Bitcoin also was designed to be fully decentralized but today you have 3 pools which have more that 50% hashing power.
Today BitShares has 101 block signers (delegates) in 2.0 it's will be configurable without hard fork, so if shareholders will decide to have more decentralization they can vote to 1001 delegate.
Bitcoin has 3+ block signers, Ripple has 7, BitShares has 101, Nxt has 700+, eMunie - potentially unlimited like Bitcoin?
I guess fuserleer meant as in fully decentralized, like when Bitcoin was still at the CPU mining stage of its development. But let's wait for him to drop by and explain.
Correct, there are no super-nodes, delegates or anything of the sort and never will be. There are no blocks and there is no mining so supply distribution is 100% fair. Consensus is achieved via a different algorithm which I posted about here a while ago.
I found eMunie consensus algorithm description here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159624.0Looks interesting, let's see how this will work in test or real network.
You make calculation for BitShares based at your excellent hardware knowledge even without understanding how BitShares exactly works.

But anyway it's will be launched 13 of October and everybody will get chance to try. If someone interesting to try how BitShares 2.0 can handle load in test network, all info can be found here:
https://bitsharestalk.orgBitShares 2.0 online wallet (test network):
https://graphene.bitshares.orgWhere/when eMunie test network will be launched?