Out of that list, Bitshares has the best scaling due to DPoS. NXT, if it ever gets transparent forging working, would have less TPS and slower block times, but better than other coins except Bitshares. Transparent forging is kind of like recreating DPoS in a more Rube Goldberg approach:
DPoS is just a centralized version of NXT's PoS which was implemented so the Larimers and a select group of manipulators (aka the Communist Chinese Gov) can effectively rig the delegate elections through "approval voting" and control the platform. Also, Bitshares ridiculous claim of 100k tps requires hardware with 1TB of ram.
NXT didn't invent PoS, so you should probably stop lying about that. NXT will also not be worth buying until someone can demonstrate they can even get transparent forging working on the platform. I honestly can't believe you're dumb enough to claim Bitshares can't do 100k TPS. NXT, which would be using an inferior method of deterministic block validation claims similar numbers. That was also Dan Hughes of Emunie claiming it requires 1TB of RAM, a guy who doesn't even know how Bitshares works. Tendermint claims 40,000 TPS functionality as well. You think Tendermint is lying too? Bitshares can do whatever Tendermint can do or more. NXT will likely do less than Bitshares while also having slower block times due to the way it's structured.
Bitshares is beating NXT to the market with both high scaling and stable market pegged assets, the two things actually required for crypto to go mainstream. Nobody wants to hold crypto until it has stability like the dollar.