Apparently contrarian opinion is not welcome in here

The problem with Martin Armstrong is there is always a "if" in his prediction. And he is already backing off with his "Big Bang 2015.75" (which is today by the way) stating the effects will take time and we won't see the consequences before xxx months (which is not the definiton of a big bang). Anyway I will leave it to it as I prefer to focus on real economists like Jim Rickards, Harry Dent and co.
He has never backed off his BIG BANG. He has always stated that is when the sovereign debt and socialism contagion would accelerate. And it is. The refugee crisis in Europe isn't a big bang

The impending blow up of Doucebag Bank isn't a big bang

Look I sold all my gold, silver, and Bitcoin at much higher prices because of Armstrong's correct prediction. I stashed away dollars instead of pesos back when the peso was 40 - 43 to the dollar (now at 47) because of Armstrong's correct prediction.
I also alerted everyone to get out of the DJIA before the recent corrections from the 18,500 high because of Armstrong's correct predictions.
And now I am telling you that the dollar and US stocks will go skyhigh was from later in 2016 to late in 2017.
This "ifs" you refer to are about waiting for the requirements of the patterns to take form, before making the confirmation and decision. You'd be idiot (which you apparently are) if you advocated otherwise.
There is no problem with contrarian opinion if you get your damn facts straight and aren't too lazy to RTFT (read the fucking thread).
Well I agree that he has some good calls but its bad ones are really bad. Come on predicting an interest rise in September (or for the remaining of the year) when EVERYBODY knows it's simply impossible and NIRP is the future. Calling a "big bang" in 2015.75 when bonds are rallying instead. If you pretend it's going to take time to unfold then call it a "big pschit"