OpenBazaar and joystream absolutely need censorship-poof money to operate.
Why?
OpenBazaar is a decentralized censorship-proof market place and Joystream is an torrent sharing platform with micro-payments to give incentive for better upload.
No need to explain further why they need censorship-proof money.
The thing is, good enough decentralization is good enough. If there is censorship, then these platforms will just migrate to another blockchain. There is no value to add censorship on a blockchain at all.
I'm not sure what "good enough" decentralization is. If I can't run a full node over a shitty internet connection in an environment that is anti-Bitcoin, then I would say the decentralization is not good enough.
Good enough decentralization is good enough to keep bitcoin censorship-free with all the feature it actually offers. I can't tell how much nodes does that represent (I guess time will tell) but being able to run it on a shitty internet connection is unnecessary although it would be a nice to have.
To answer your question I do run a node but I don't mind if I can't at some point but I'm also sure the market will come up with cheap solutions so I can continue for a long time ahead regardless of how bitcoin scales.
Either you have fantastic resources, gimp your node like I do, or are extremely optimistic. Do you keep track of the bandwidth your node currently uses with the 1mb spam limit in place?
I guess I'm extremely optimistic but as I said, I don't really mind if I won't be able to run a node at some point. Why should I care anyway? The cat is out of the bag and if bitcoin eventually become too centralized and allow censorship then I'll just move to the next uncensored blockchain just like I will do if the bitcoin blockchain doesn't scale enough.