You are the one who is bitter. You - like brg444 - are one of those who notoriously attack others ad hominem. Your newest ad hominem attack: "Hearn is a sociopath".
It's not ad hominem when it's:
- The actual point of an argument
- True
In other word: an ad hominem is not an ad hominem when I do it. Riiiight.
No, it's about whether the value judgement is the subject of a debate or whether it is intended as a subversive or diversive tactic i.e. actually conforming to the actual definition of ad hominem
But there's no need to explain to you, you re-write the book on subversive and diversionary argumentative tactics (literally) all day long (indeed, I'm currently defending myself from your twisted logic approach).
You should try to defend yourself with arguments instead of fluffy meaningless post (like above).