I even gave them a fork that would solve one of the biggest issues for anyone using the client, that no one can see whether they are minting or not, how long it will take to mint, and the reward they'd lose if they transfer their coins. But the Neucoin team hasn't done anything with it. I can only guess that they just don't have the expertise and the knowledge of how Peercoin works to be able to even figure out if my code works.
i was interested in readnig fork but apparently you deleted it, could you re-upload it ?
i don't think they will integrate it anyway, it would be like bitcoin showing how much time you have until a new block will be generated (or maybe neuteam are too noob to see it)
btw, don't you think that funny that liqio where not able to use your csv flie but still give his technical pov ??
Ok, it's back up. I took it down because I didn't want to people to see it as a show of support. I updated the README with my position.
im sorry to bring this to you but maybe it's a good thing you are nolonger in the bay area, the idea 1/3 of your commit s about editing the readme, 1/4 about merging (rebase anyone?) and the rest is copy/paste or commit message with weird statement like «
I think I changed the future log message, not sure... »
http://i.imgur.com/JtAywAo.jpglooking ate the getneucoin (fucking 1998 webiste with sound enableb by defautl) & myneucoin (hdwallet anyone?) code is weird because they are two diffrent thing one is made with python the other php (apparently getneucoin is the faucet site (lol)) maybe is that the reason why they cant integrate it... no communication on it...
anyone tried to reach coin news site to know who paid them and did they paid them with neucoin bitcoin or $$$ ? this thread is fucking huge and im starting to sort thing out would be nice to know if its dank or a fundation that are paying for it
ill try to bring more asap
Geez, man... harsh. What does it matter how many changes I made to the README? I was tasked with learning how the code worked, what it did, and accomplish my task all at the same time. And yes, I was also learning how to use git and how to interface with github, too (I also didn't know how github displays README's in general. They're preview functionality kind of sucks). I just did it as a hack so I could mint effectively, and thought it would be nice to share.
And that commit message was before I was even considering releasing it to the public.
I noticed you didn't bring up anything about the changes I did implement. Did you even look at them? Read the README, where I go through the specific details on how to mint effectively? Most of the work actually was reading the code and figuring out exactly how Neucoin/Peercoin worked, which I was by no means an expert on before I started this. Doing all of that in the time I did so I could get ready to mint from day 1 was actually a pretty good accomplishment.
What's your goal here? Why'd you want to see my code if all you're going to do is tear apart the superficial stuff without taking a look at what I did do?
