Gmax might complain about social strokes, but throwing Hearn (and Garzik?) under the bus had the desired salubrious clarifying effects.
Has Garzik been misbehaving too?
he's been the one pretending to be somehow offended with hearn's ban from the logs. real drama queen, pretending hearns ideas are somehow worth anything for a start..
but then again coming from someone working for the fail of a company that bitpay is makes it even more ironic..
oh and not even mention his bip100 fraud..
Oh well. He's been increasing less relevant anyway, although he's made countless large & small contributions to Bitcoin in the past. I suppose you could say the same for Hearn and Andresen, but Jeff Garzik has been more valuable to bitcoin development than both of them together. It's true that BIP100 is not one of his more valuable efforts (what a massive surprise that miners preferred the solution that puts them in charge
)