Well...

Get a load of this. Here is their reply. Actually, it's worse than I thought it would be.

This might be too much info, but combine this with whatever your experience is to come to your own conclusions. I know you are solidifying mine. Perhaps Companies like yours (and GAWMiners/Zenminers - Who has a bunch of our money) send warning signs based on how you treat certain customers.

Of course, now that I'm publicizing this, and this message is totally recognizable by you guys, I won't be surprised if you all out restrict/ban my account. A sure sign of what you were all about from the start.

Why am I doing this? Because I'm not the only one who has been treated like this, and companies like you aren't totally straight about things and you get away with it. And when you fail to keep your end of the bargain you  try to ride on how straight you are when you have not been:


On 2015-10-02 17:32, Support wrote:
> __________________________________
>
> -------------------------
>
>  XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
>  SUBJECT: Recent Webinar
> -------------------------
>  OCT 03, 2015 | 0X:XXPM PDT
>  XXXXXXX replied:
>
> Hello there,
>
> Unfortunately I do not have access to who was blocked or not from the
> WEBNAR. Unfortunately I will not be able to help you on that. Thank
> you!
>
> -------------------------
>
> How satisfied were you with the assistance we provided today? [1] |
> [2] | [3] | [4]
> -------------------------
>  OCT 01, 2015 | 02:34AM PDT
>  Original message
>  XXXXXXX wrote:
>
> From your recent "Webinar", I have users contact me about why you guys
> blocked me from asking questions.
>
> I explained to them that I asked "Why my account was given "E" raiting
> (now it's D) in your system when I (I represent a corporation) gave
> ALL of my LEGITIMATE and LEGAL United States of America personal
> information.
>
> Your competitors (including LoanBase (Bit Lending Club) check and
> accepted EVERY piece of my information (I have proof if you like) and
> found it to be in order, so I've concluded that your rating of me MUST
> be personal. I don't know if it's my color, where I live, or what, but
> as an adult, I have used the SAME information to establish and
> maintain BANKING and STOCK TRADING relationships, but I'm not good
> enough for your service? That wreaks of discrimination! And when it
> comes to dealing with money, I will not hesitate to warn others.
>
> You claim to hold users of your system to high standards and I feel
> its only fair that you be held to high standards yourself, and
> discrimination is unacceptable in the global financial community.
>
> XXXXXXX
>
> P.S. This is well beyond believing any generic, canned "We reviewed
> your information" reply. My information was specific, long standing,
> and vetted and verifiable FAR BEFORE YOUR COMPANY CAME ON THE SCENE.
>
> -------------------------
>


And to them I replied:

You side stepped the real issue, which is "Whats going on with the treatment", of me and my account that is.

I wasn't asking you to look in to who blocked me.

And nonsense, you know EXACTLY who blocked me. THE PERSON WHO WAS SITTING THERE ON THE SCREEN, READING, SCANNING, AND SCREENING THE QUESTIONS IN OUR FACES.

Perhaps I'll get a more sensible answer over at what seems to be your public support thread at bitcointalk.org?

Ok.

------------------------------

And my rating is STILL blank.