If the token represents no more than a 'share' in a company then it no longer has any intrinsic value as money - it simply serves as a proxy for a corporate body of ambiguous economic worth.
I did not say a token represents a share. As I see it -
in this hypothetical mulling over - MNs could act as class "A" shares, so MN owners can have an advantage of "first investors" and the company, if there would ever be a company, could issue its shares. Token stays as a monetary unit and trades separately.
The value comes from the token adopting a decentralised monetary role, not a utility-asset role, since the absence of a trusted third party is an essential factor in its definition as unbacked, base money.
So, we're going back to thinking of DASH as a currency (say XDA for the prefix 'X' denotes a non-national affiliation or a monetary metal) that is "competing" (trading for) against other currencies like USD or YPY, otherwise what would determine its value? Me willing to buy some tokens for "X" amount of fiat and your readiness to match the price and sell it to me?
It seems like a vacuum to me, the vacuum that would suck the life out of this project unless it starts living outside our small lunatic fringe community...