Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: [SDC] ShadowCash Uncensored: Zeuner, Zero Knowledge, Zero Trust. What Happened?
by
child_harold
on 05/10/2015, 11:17:28 UTC
Quote from: smooth on October 05, 2015, 10:51:19 AM
Quote from: rustynailer on October 05, 2015, 10:50:28 AM
Quote from: child_harold on October 05, 2015, 10:44:29 AM
Quote from: smooth on October 05, 2015, 10:19:01 AM
Quote from: Gillette on October 05, 2015, 09:58:09 AM
Quote from: smooth on October 05, 2015, 09:45:32 AM
Quote from: Wanderlust on October 04, 2015, 07:54:17 PM
So why are NIZKPs and ring sigs used when only one is required for anon? Anybody?

NIZKP are part of the method used by CryptoNote ring signatures, which was copied by SDC. It is in section 4.4 of the CryptoNote white paper.


Do xmr and sdc have technically the same anon feature?

It isn't exactly the same due to the nature of the code bases (SDC is built on top of a Bitcoin fork, Monero is not), and there are some other small details that are different, but the overall method of the ring signatures is the same.


I could kiss you smooth. What's you take on the ShadowSendv2 whitepaper?

And now you want to kiss smooth.....   Come on man, now your taking this a step too far.   Wink  

I agree.


For answering a Q I express my gratitude.

So NIZKPs and Ring SIgs are part of the same CN technology? OK
And the WP isnt bad despite not referencing CN correctly? You are more generous than others Ive spoken to regarding this

Zeuner asked for more documentation. Does this seem reasonable to you and can you explain why providing documentation for a crytographic peer review could be so time consuming it has been placed on the backburner for almost a year? Would it not be wiser to have ShadowSend properly tested before moving on to the Market?