Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud)
by
VeritasSapere
on 05/10/2015, 23:54:51 UTC
Quote from: sidhujag on October 05, 2015, 11:51:14 PM
Quote from: brg444 on October 05, 2015, 11:06:34 PM
Quote from: sidhujag on October 05, 2015, 11:03:19 PM
Quote from: coalitionfor8mb on October 05, 2015, 10:51:23 PM
Quote from: sidhujag on October 05, 2015, 10:20:47 PM
Right now im leaning on not increasing the block size until the time is right... when is it right? When a 0 fee transaction cannot get included in a block for more than 5 days (current bank wire transfer times). By then hopefully we solve the technical problems and are in need for smaller fees.

Yep, you're sensing it right, I have come to the same conclusions only maybe from a different perspective.
We will get to the block-size increase decision eventually as the Time Goes By.

Thanks just got into the debate and wanted to see if I fully understood what the problem was about... so why can Gaven not see this? I mean it took me like an hour to get the facts down and realize its a bad idea right now? whats his view?

You can't possibly have missed all this lulz ?  Cheesy

Gavin has been compromised by Mike Hearn and his merry band of socialist shills who are attempting to press urgency under the pretense that the cap is stalling Bitcoin MAINSTREAM adoption.

I know that part its obvious... so what are their arguments for?
Read their arguments for yourself and make up your own mind, there is a lot of disinformation and ad hominem on these forums. This is an article written by Mike Hearn explaining why he thinks we should increase the blocksize:

https://medium.com/faith-and-future/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1