What is so wrong with making it easier for the community to express their free choice by giving them more options? If development indeed does decentralize as per the animation below, how is that a bad thing?
Multiple implementations of the consensus rules will elicit unplanned chain forks, and the chaos that would ensue.
If the probability of forking could be understood and made arbitrarily small, would you agree that multiple implementations were a positive think for Bitcoin?
This is clearly what you intend Peter; to kill Bitcoin with "kindness".
Do you really believe I am trying to kill Bitcoin?