Re: [SDC] ShadowCash Uncensored: Zeuner, Zero Knowledge, Zero Trust. What Happened?

And now you want to kiss smooth..... Come on man, now your taking this a step too far. Wink

Oh you're just jealous Wink

Or maybe it's Stockholm syndrome, LOL

So you finally dropped by? Good to see you rusty, do you like what I've done with the place?

Well this really saddens me CH. Sad

You're better than this and its upsetting to see you lower yourself down to smooth or even bentachs level of mudslinging.

I know others may not agree with me here, but I really hope once you get things sorted out that you can come back home. Take care buddy.

If you feel sad you can probably imagine how I feel. Thinking back on how much song & dance I raised over Zeuner months ago only to now find I am still without the review that I told everybody I know about. I have lost face and so has Shadow over this.

As far as mudslinging (I assume you're referring to the POW phase stuff I linked). People will make up their own minds about that and can do so just by reading the first few pages of the original SDC thread as I did for the first time a couple weeks back.

The censorship on the main SDC thread is totally out-of-control and LongAndShort's ANN only policy is bound to raise some eyebrows. I really dont see how asking questions about Zeuner in that thread is considered off-topic and I have little motivation at this point to struggle to post there without deletion, always wondering which of LongAndShorts triggers I might upset.

It has almost always been about the anon for me: Darkcoin, Monero, Bytecoin, Cloakcoin, Bytecoin, Shadow
A long and tiring pilgrimage indeed lasting three or so years.

OUR COMMUNITY DESERVED THAT REPORT. DAMMIT - I DESERVED THAT REPORT Angry

WITHOUT IT SHADOW CANNOT PROVE INNOVATION AND HAS LITTLE VALUE.

Nobody will use the market or shaodwsend seriously until proper peer-review.

By coincidence the most recent episode of LetsTalkBitcoin deals with the subject of peer review and whitepapers and discusses a new web-based peer review journal called Ledger. I suggest you submit the whitepaper to them (for free) and see what they have to say. AT one point one of the Ledger guys says that crypto projects would do well to have there stuff peer-reviewed before launch. Oh well. Still though give it a go.

https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/lets-talk-bitcoin-252-new-ideas-in-cryptocurrency
http://ledgerjournal.org/ojs/index.php/ledger/announcement/view/4

Be courageous.

This time next year Rusty

You're sitting on the sidelines as a a cheerleader wondering why you didn't get a championship ring when your team won it.

Get involved.

You should also stop spewing your claims of a solominer getting a majority of block rewards after a single mining pool went down when the block reward kicked in. It's pure bullshit. Given the entire spectrum of evidence, you will always be wrong about that.