1. Even without a solo miner there are many questions raised
2. Proving me wrong should consist of a couple links to ShadoeCash tx's showing funds moving from the suspicious addy to the non-suspicious one.
Do you have such a tx? Please link
1. The questions you asked beyond the solominer have been answered.
Stop spamming this ambiguous crap.
2. The burden of proof is on the person forming the argument. I've addressed the premises of your original conclusion adequately enough to uproot your argument.
1. Absolutely not. Even SDC Team member dasource (who I do not belive was involved with SDC in these early days) sayd he'll be launching his own investigation in order to restore faith.
See below.
2 Are you telling me you cannot find a tx showing the transfer funds from the suspicious address to a non-suspicious one? That should be easy.
Is this ship sinking?
Whats going on?, i read about chickenstripes?, WTF?!
You read child_harold's fud attempt. His claims of no mining pool existing for 3 days and a solominer are completely false. Proof can be found with the blockchain and the original thread.
I suggest you prove your point in my SDC thread (your posts here may well be deleted). Even if you are correct there is still the reduction of
20 million to 6 million and the PoW phase length reduction from 30 days to just 11. Why? Becuase of scrypt ASICs? Really?
And there is for me, and maybe others, a crisis in trust due to the fact there is still no peer review and without peer review proving innovation SDC has little value.
FACT there was never a concrete 20M Coin Supply .. you're inability to understand basic PoW/PoS hybrid mining is the issue here. Regarding the reduction of mining period and its real effect I will also review and post FACTUAL figures v.s. assumptions/speculation
1. I've replied to your "why did the devs cut mining short" on two separate threads. If you want a dev to answer you, PM them on slack.
2. No, I'm telling you I don't have to waste my time finding that evidence because you have no evidence proving that the initial coinbase rewards mined from that address were transferred to suspicious addresses in the first place. That argument was never made by you and no evidence exists to support that argument. Why am I supposed to counterargue? Do you understand how LOGIC works?
Can you prove that you're not a troll?