I was probably the first person to read Dan's high level overview blog of Emunie and the entire theme of it was balance sheets vs input/output blockchains. Now he's saying that is not the case and it's not a balance sheet or ledger, but something different. It's too hard to even discuss this thing if the goal posts are always up in the air or vaguely described.
He said I'm incorrectly describing the system. What do you expect? One second we got blocks, next second we got some type of DAG tree, then we got hatchers, then we don't got hatchers, what the hell is a hatcher anyway? How long until Evan Duffield randomly forks Darkcoin and renames them to Darkhatchers?
I don't believe I ever said balance sheets, usually I refer to is as balance tracking....if I did post balance sheets in a response to one of the 100s of questions anywhere, then thats my bad.
You
are incorrectly describing the system, and stating it as "fact" in some of your negative posting. I've repeatedly stated that I'm working on the documentation that will describe it accurately and that forum posts hastily constructed to answer a question may have errors or wrong terminology.
On one hand you are stating its too difficult to understand without documentation, the next you are posting in threads that eMunie is going to blow up, that its not comparable to block chains or anything of the sort. How can you make these claims when you have stated you don't fully understand the system yet because I haven't presented all the documentation? I'm beginning to get the feeling this is more of a witch-hunt rather than a real desire to understand and dissect.
Further more, these changes you are talking of have been progress over 2 years or more, hardly sudden changes.