Well, how can I?
First you say that Webster's is "pretty much spot on", only later to recant and state "that's only one part of the free market", when I pointed out what the definition really says.
It seems that you are unable to distinguish between an unregulated market and a free market. Indeed, investopedia.com calls a free market a "A market economy based on supply and demand with little or no government control.".
So I reiterate that in the US., do private businesses
a) set their own prices among each other, and
b) do they compete with one another?
Ok now you are getting annoying. You just cherry pick my words and get hang up on some silly misunderstanding and fail to read my content of my posts.
I already explained it like 3 times what I mean but you still stick to the definition glitch. How about you read my post and reply to those arguments.
I already answered to your questions, so either you reply to the contents of my posts or the discussion is over.