Then, again, miscommunication -- unless you consider the likes of Mircea Popescu "not status quo", which would be just plain twisting of words.
I don't have any idea what his opinion is about this.
In other subjects in the past he's been completely right about the subject matter, excessive in his language. Something that has happened also to Luke. This doesn't make them any less right when they are right.
Then again, how exactly is status quo an irrational stance?
Obviously there can be several takes on what does that mean in practice. If they mean "oppose any progress, change or improvement" then obviously I'm against that but then again who isn't? If the statu quo (more correct Latin grammar is statu quo not status quo) means "the system works let's keep it working", then I'm all for it, as opposed to breaking it with absurd decisions.
----
Jorge, we already had this exact same conversation, I'm not going to have it again.