like your 5 other alts
Uhuh, sure, like I've got that much time to spend on this account as I do *and* all those others? But deflection is all you have I guess, as evidenced by your further response below.
and just like them you too deny to leave -ve on some specific mining services, which does not show any mining/payment proof.
I don't give a shit about payment proof, as I've explained it isn't evidence of anything.
You know something? I haven't even bothered looking up Bit-X, because it isn't something that pings up on threads with people pointing out obvious scam-flags, like you get with cloudmining.website and scrypt.cc and clouminr.io and all the other obvious-ponzi-is-obvious fraudulent operations.
I'll go take a quick look now.
*paused*
*done*
Bit-X could well be a *really* elaborate scam, I mean *really* *really* elaborate to the degree that they have the largest ASIC hardware manufacturer in the world partnering up with them and yet they still end up fucking everybody over in the long run.
Hi All,
We are glad to announce an official thread of BitFury Group. Here we will publish all important information about our Company.
BitFury Group has chosen Bit-X a new online platform for cryptocurrency exchange, to serve for the time being as a platform for trading BitFury's hash power.
MORE DETAILS:
Q: How much does it cost?
A: The market defines the price.
Q: How much do you sell? Any specific requirements to qualify to buy?
A: Currently, 1PH has been allocated to Bit-X, no specific requirements.
Q: Is that the only place where BitFury sells its hashpower?
A: At this time, this is the only public trading place for BitFury's hashpower.
Other than, perhaps, the risk of fractional mining, exactly what can be deduced about them that is sufficiently shady to warrant a confident -ve rating?
By all means, please explain to me how your scam's regular payment history, which you so love to tout as being evidence of legitimacy, is *any* different from, say, Bernie Madoff, who made sure his ponzi-based scheme was able to pay out reliably for more than thirty years, with regards to such being evidence of anything?
By all means, please explain me why you leave -ve on me, but spare Bit-X promoters ?

So, as I said, you can't keep deflecting on to other issues as though the act of deflection answers the question, it doesn't. All it does is make you look either stupid, dishonest or both.
Are you ready to concede that your repeated use of cloudmining.website's payment history serves as NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER as to whether they are actually mining?