In fact I found this article on a politically neutral newspaper (90% of the local newspaper have political background, and that newspaper is a rare one which is quite neutral).
Also I don't think I've translated anything wrong. The article said satoshi or someone else is the 'dealer' of the bitcoin market, that is, they got the most advantage from trading of bitcoins (but the answer is: definitely no!).
I've also seen someone said it is extracted from a blog which no one watchs. Yes, I personally won't watch those comments (on stocks), however the word 'bitcoin' in the title attracts me to watch, and just see it is another piece of false information...
well 'satoshi or someone else is the 'dealer' of the bitcoin market' is not what you first wrote. which means you didnt directly quote and as such words and meaning were lost between the write and you comments.
im not having a go at you, im just using your words as a example that things do get lost in translation or just forgotten with each person that it passes.. so as i said the writer may have forgot a few details from what his friend told him, and you forgot a few details of the exact wording the writer wrote.
.. its like the bible.. many many rewrites over 20 centuries.. do you really think that people living in the middle east were actually called mary and joseph.. or possibly Miryam and Yosef
so unless an article is an internationally renowned financial paper, wrote by financial experts that have personal experience and write a full detailed and researched article... then there is no need to worry about the article. as it holds about as much weight as a blog