You guys really suck at PR. There has been many claims of the code not being original and were backed up with solid proofs, how would you answer them? Does John even care to save the coin's rep?
There is no PR at all, just pure non stop
development for almost a year already. If you don't remember how it started let me remind you, or you can refresh memories
here yourself.
- Closed source
- Minor GUI bugs
- NO console
- NO encryption
- NO UDP
- NO iOS&Android wallets
- NO GPU&FPGA
- NO Crawler
- NO ZeroTime
- NO incentive rewards
Now VNL has everything from the list above in a year and what persons (won't mention names) did themselves in the same timeframe? Were
bitching and trolling? Cool stuff nothing to add.
Crypto is full of scammers, vaporware hyped
shit, greedy&lame devs and now look at VNL, feel the difference?
This has already been overly discussed. Read all of the source code and then decide for yourself. If you find anything suspicious your next move would be to hire an IP lawyer to verify the claims are valid. This is how these situations are handled in the real world, not on bitcointalk.org by repeating the same non-facts and expecting some result.

Thank you for your support.
https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/221/4-month-timeline/3