and you know what? miners and nodes didn't support his fork. boo hoo. he proved just how decentralized bitcoin development is -- no one controls the code -- and even temporarily garnered some limited support for his fork. but it failed. and the idea that it could achieve 75% hashing power at this point is laughable. if nodes and miners do not support alternative versions, that is not evidence to say that "centralization of development" exists. it only says that unpopular versions are unpopular.
As to miners, the pool that I tried was DDoS'd and had to stop mining BIP101 blocks. As to nodes the XT node that I was running was DDoS'd. I am no longer running a full bitcoin node.
Do you believe that how bitcoin works should be controlled by terrorist attacks? Do you support "consensus" based on violence and fear?