......[1] "Full" node means different things in these different designs, but I have equated them in the sense of the node that must have global knowledge about either all the transactions or in LN's case all the payment channels.
I'd be interested to see if you can solve an issue that people underestimate as needing resolution: how to prove full node is actually a full node.
Along the lines of :
https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2015/09/16/proof-of-unique-blockchain-storage-revised/Sergio is refining my proof-of-storage concept from 2013. But I don't think proving you are full node is important in my design. Everyone seems to view this as important for eliminating the centralization of pools, but there are no pools in my design because in my design proof-of-work is not profitable (but it is economic). I am going to reveal the unperceived dualism in some of the concepts of crypto-currency.
Perhaps with a clarification to the average consumer: ION: Self-banking made easy
Ah yes I had forgotten that was one of the reason I had stated I liked it, "i-on" or "i-own", meaning for "i' control the switch. I think that point was in my other thread (or maybe it was a private Bitmessage). My memory of the past weeks and months is a fog.