Litecoin wasn't that "evenly" distributed, as the first day had its own instamine.
http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins#litecoin"Despite being Bitcoin's supposed silver to it's gold, Litecoin does not escape from this analysis kindly. In the first 96 hours, we see a well defined curve that demonstrates instamining occurred, showing 450,000 LTC being created in less than 6 hours."
No wonder dash had the same issue at the start, as it was based on LTC code, but with a spin regarding hash type and diff. adjustment.
After all this time and all I've learned, I have come to the realization that it doesn't matter one hoot how the coins or tokens or whatever were or are distributed. In the scheme of things, it's all one huge pre-mine. How many people are in the crypto space all together? 10,000 tops? I doubt it's anywhere close to that.
No, none of these coins have good distribution. None of them. What we have are a bunch of competing projects, where either you make your project's tokens worth something or they disappear. IF the project finds a way to be useful, then the tokens will cease to be speculative.
And the tokens will be sold off over time to a wider and wider audience. And it will be an identical path for all cryptos. This crying over distribution is stupid and will not effect the growth of the coin that actually solves the problems facing crypto currency today.