Hi thelion007, thanks for taking an interest in BARR.
................
But I'm not sure what you mean by "bingo", since it doesn't apply to anything you said. Since you didn't actually say anything, I can only guess what your point was supposed to be. Are you saying that all 3 devs of these coins abandoned the coins? I agree. That's why we're trying to completely destroy these coins and their entire supplies. If you have anything you'd actually like to say, please go ahead.
It is pretty clear what I was trying to say, you've awarded yourself the biggest stake from those three coins you've accumulated through their extended down time.
Really convenient that your filtered shitcoin list ended up with those specific coins. Just don't play the heal the alt world card, your agenda is clear. It's just another scheme of which you will have the edge, starting with these 3 coins and those redeemable later on that you
could (benefit of the doubt) be currently accumulating. I will say no more unless my post gets deleted.
fair enough- however I might add another angle, and that is that of course people taking the initiative have got the edge.
idea, initiative, risk- get rewarded.
of course, this definition discounts dishonest schemes, but I do not think that this project is dishonest.
if there is potential benefit for a lot of people involved, why should the initiator not have an edge?