My main thing is like I said I push people to research. I make 0 money off of what people decide on cloud mining. So I don't push, just tell them to research before doing investment.
Then why did u keep mum when I published my research results and tmfp was attacking me for publishing it? Is it the case that the research result must show certain cloud mining is better than the other to be reagarded as valid?I don't think I attacked you did i? I do think some are better then others, but I don't think I remember anything with you and I. I also push people to come to their own conclusion on what cloud mining they trust.
So if you were pushing one I likely remained quiet, as I think the investor should make that call. But I do speak in mining and cloud mining in general as my love of mining.
At the time, while you are pushing for imaginary research or fighting for fake legitimacy, www.CloudMining.website has published another blockchain proof of their payment...
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/9a959a3e72ff3161d11059b05918e0c43224538d6391e638d1e3cbe01330b3ef
Will your super legit cloud miners dare to show some blockchain proof ?
As fake proof you mean me asking about hardware? Yes... before a investment I would want to make sure there is hardware. It's nothing against you but you seem to take it personal as you cannot show hardware.
Why attack me for telling people to research before investing? I think they will find legit sites on their own. You have been mad many times at me. I guess I don't see a payment with no other info as proof. How do we not know 3/4 of those being paid are not you? Or that you are not just paying part of what you bring in as you do not ever mention hardware or proof there? I personally just don't see a random blog as being a 3rd party to brag about as if you have been audited, that blog does not mean a whole lot to most people.
I mean again it's nothing personal I make 0 dollars no matter what people decide. I just think they should research and ask question, no matter what the investment.