I forgot to say thank you to everyone that participated in this thread. I am grateful for the interaction which spawned the clickz name idea. And I do mean everyone that posted and voted in thread, excluding no one.



Thanks. I prefer clickz because it is more clearly associated with clicks, and avoiding the attrition of confusion is paramount. Although clix is shorter, the spelling might not be as memorable as click+z. Once you start butchering click, then many spellings arise such as clics, klix, klics, klicks, klickz, etc.. So I thought it was better to add z to non-butchered click, so it is click and instead of s then a z, but also I don't really mind if people say "pay me 5 clicks" instead of "pay me 5 clickz" because they are still using the same software and protocol. However, if they say the former and mean instead "pay me 5 clix", although they might be using the same software and protocol as "clix", the is also chance they are using "clics, klix, klics, klicks, klickz" protocol instead. In short or more quantitatively, I prefer the choice with the minimum Levenshtein distance from clicks.

However, I do want to guard against the confusion of copycoins, thus I have registered the following domains due to your feedback:

clickzit.net	($12)
clix.cash	($25)
clix.space	($2)

So we can give the users the option of using 'clickz', 'clix', or 'clickzits" for the largest units of the coin (ion is proposed as the smallest unit), and let the community preference take hold. This should hopefully demotivate copycoins from abusing our name. Also just in case the market prefers 'clix' (in case my logic above on the choice is overpowered by the collective market wisdom).

On 'zing', I like it for the sound, short spelling (although it could be misspelled 'xing'), and association with swiftness and energy, but I think in hindsight that it lacks the target market focus of clickz. And it looks like a rip-off from Microsoft's Bing search engine. I remain open-minded however. My perspective could be colored by my own subjectivity, so I allow time to widen my experience and eyes before becoming totally firm on clickz.


It appears to me to the best. I will be surprised if better name is found for the mass adoption market of microtransactions and block chain scaling. Many investors think in terms of 'picocoin' or 'picopay' but users don't think of microtransaction as small money but rather about features they can access (the monetary exchange should be so small they don't have to think about it and approve each occurrence but instead just click and go), synergies they can obtain, quality upgrades to content, etc.. Degrading all those wonderful qualities by characterizing money as small is a "wtf r they thinking" moment for me. I think I have some marketing skills, but always so do a lot of you and collectively you have more wisdom than I do (so it is matter of instigating this interactive creative process) because there are no bad ideas (from crap ideas spawn winning ideas).

Btw, I am offering some unsolicited brainstorming for the name of Boolberry. I think they are not going to change the name and that may be the best decision. But any way, here are my ideas:

Blurberry
Mixberry
Peekabool
Entangle
Shuffle
Haystack
Entropy (irreversible)
Matrix
Mingle
Obfuscate
Mixalot
Fungible / Fungibit
Blur / Blurbit
Chrochet
Delink
Unchain

Edit: I didn't register clix.one nor clickz.one, which are both available. Seems we don't want the users to think they will only be able to click once or connote restriction of choices.