If you can't understand the implications of what I said then it would behove you to discuss it with me, rather than insulting me.
What if we buy you a case of beer with blockchain budget proposal ? (un-sporked of course. You could do the taste test). I for one may have insulted you by suggesting you used a Sinclair Spectrum for which I apologise ( - that might have been agesist of me

)
All the same, setting aside the inflammatory rhetoric on both sides, you raise some useful points. The Spork is a powerful and appropriate tool for this project and code transparency is a a necessary security priority.
I think Evan once said he was working on a way to make the Spork automatic. Automatic triggers and automatic reversions. I can see this working. And it would make the spork completely decentralized, removing the accusations and keeping the functionality. But it's been a while, so I don't know if this is going anywhere?