In this kind of view the opinions are divided. Some people don't care about this second part of interpretation and think that their action do good to bitcoin. The seconds ones, which put in balance what is right and what is wrong and then decide choosing the right, think that their action do bad to bitcoin making the others to think that bitcoin is used mostly by the criminals and for doing bad things. I'm part of the second group.
I care a great deal about right and wrong. I enjoy doing what I think is right and feel bad doing what I think is wrong.
I do not believe that all crime is necessarily bad. "Crime" is defined by the state and I do not believe that the state is perfect. If I thought the state were perfect then I would trust its money and have little interest in trustless money experiments such as Bitcoin.
I care little about appeasing those that think "crime = bad". On the contrary, I care to dispel this myth.