increasing the blocksize up to the point that our technology will allow so that it does not compromise the principles of decentralization and financial freedom.
We are already well past this point, as many people have stopped running nodes because they couldn't justify the expense and the inconvenience of having their connection seriously burdened.
Now the question is not compromising these principles much more, because past 200KB or so they are already compromised.
Let's not even question this again because it's well known by now.
I disagree and we have discussed this extensively already so maybe we can just agree to disagree.
Obviously I do not support your extremist position that blocks over 200KB are to large. I think that Bitcoin can support much larger blocks without compromising decentralization and financial freedom.