your Phoenix Journals express the Bible to be supreme
Quote it, please.
No, I won't quote it
Since you won't quote the text that validates your point, I will assume that your claim is false.
...
All right, all right. Here it is, below.
But on the other hand, "Jesus" Sananda tells us that man is all-powerful; this means that God is within man:I am your brother, NOT your God! ...
This God is what the God of the Bible is. ...This is your answer. If you don't have enough logic to understand it, that doesn't hurt anyone except yourself and others who don't have enough logic to see.
BADecker, you are the one who is being illogical. You have claimed:
your Phoenix Journals express the Bible to be supremeBUT that quote above does not even use the world "Bible", as you have claimed. You cannot idly conclude that these books say something that they do not really say. So where is the logic??
Please, carefully observe my use of reason to correct your false claim, and tell me where I am wrong in case I am not being
logical.
You are claiming that there is a
"God of the Bible".
I am not so sure that all of the stories in the Bible are true depictions of God; in fact, I think your claim that the Bible is "supreme" (as in supremely true) is very obviously false, and I will make 2 points in this regard:
1) There were over 28 full gospels written and known. A scholar from South Germany chose the four which were placed into your New Testament--need I say more? How can you continue to be so narrow?
2) It has been tampered with on numerous occasions.
This discussion is not about what your NAME is for
GOD, it is about the
BIBLE; when you say "God of the Bible", you have to realize the logical comments 1 and 2 above; in fact these 2 points are straight out of the Phoenix Journals, so how can the Bible be "supreme"??
Is it not logical that an obvious instance of tampering is the story in the Bible where God terrorizes a child (Isaac) in order to teach the child's father "a lesson"? Anyone can see that there is no way that a God who is good would do this. Maybe that is why atheists "hate religion" and one of the famous atheists wrote a book titled "God is not Great" to make that very point. I don't think man
needs books and I think you are misled by that Bible because it has been perverted by the enemy (antichrist). Instead of trying to address how the story is talking about a God of goodness, you should realize what has really happened to that book; your claim that it is "supreme" is simply not logical!
By the way, I have made another poignant post on the "logic" of surrendering your discernment to the Bible, in response to MMH:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg12681698#msg12681698