So you'll be voting for No Change then. That's your prerogative. Others may feel differently.
I don't get what's so bad about a halvening at the 2 year mark six months from now.. Especially when there are security risks involved. I don't believe there is any risk of loss of reputation for taking reasonable measures to protect the coin.
No, I'll be voting for no change unless security risks become security threats. We're not there yet, and there's no guarantee that we'll ever be. IMO protecting the coin is paramount, but this does not include its value. We owe it to the coin to let the market determine that aspect. CLAM is not just another shitcoin; let us not treat it as such.
Such is your opinion, and thank you for sharing it. So far, you and BayAreaCoins are strongly opposed to any changes. Understood. Based on lots of other feedback, others definitely feel differently about it. The 2 of you do not hold Veto decision-making powers here and that will continue to be true no matter how much BayAreaCoins huffs and puffs.
You still haven't answered what's terribly bad about a halvening in May 2016. People are ready to quit the coin because of this digger situation. It's time to find a compromise and make a
community decision.