-snipped the blah that is above-
He is the moderator of the company? I want to moderator pointed out to me where I had the spam posts/ Maybe tomorrow you too will find yourself in this list because this post? "Registered and expecting the bonus amount now.username - ANdr0id Thanks!"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1240935.msg12917391#msg12917391 ore There should be clear rules
Dude, it was a giveaway that only asked specifically to only post a username to get the bonus. Am I sposse to post a paragraph about how the program is doing? No, that is not what was asked of the thread. That is one post. I would get that one post not counted, but that is upto the manager to decide that. Also if there is abuse of the campaign in their eyes from any of it's enrolled members, it's not the participants job to make that call, our job is post quality and not non-sensical driffel.
It was an example. I do not believe that you have violated the rules of the company. I pointed out that anyone can get the status of a spammer
Okay, this is my question: How is it determined to ban somebody from the campaign for bad posting etiquette or just excluding the post from payment? I mean, there are times that I would like to post in off topic or some other interesting thread that isn't considered relevant but does that put me up for a ban consideration? Also, some threads only warrant a one line response or simple answer....do those posts warrant a banning or a non-payment.
I understand that there are several accounts that abuse the campaign because I randomly chose some usernames from the spreadsheet, I reviewed their post quality, and I was shocked at what I found! It seems simple to me: if you're abusing the campaign then you should be removed....The problem, in my opinion, is the management of the campaign....rules need to be set down and enforced. I understand that that is time consuming and burdensome but not only will it save money in the long term, it will also add legitimacy to the product and the campaign.