Of course you disagree, and you should not be criticized for defending yourself or a fellow poster from false accusations as you are doing with Rarity.
False. I only presented evidence to substantiate the moderators decision to ban Rarity.
The name Zhou Tong was in the title, you don't get to pretend it was not about him. You are being dishonest and absurd, the discussion assumed his guilt and was examining his psychology. Read the thread.
Irrelevant.
The unnecessary posts in question were pointing out the need for moderation of death threats. You can't find any real examples because they don't exist.
The posts are the evidence which you required and now you are ignoring.
A request for evidence is not a claim.
False.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/claim?q=claimDefinition of claim
1 [reporting verb] state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof:
We should discuss the chilling effects of long time
user Rarity being banned for questioning Theymos in the scam accusations forum. Theymos may feel he is totally innocent in his role as a partner and officer with GLBSE but on a forum which depends on free speech for its value it is quite disturbing that this is the method used when the head administrator is questioned. The conflict of interests between Theymos' role with GLBSE and his role as overseer of the moderators on this forum who are judging scam accusations against his company has come to a point where it cannot be ignored when critics are being silenced. Theymos should step down as administrator on Bitcointalk at least until this matter is resolved. Even if totally innocent, the appearance of impropriety in this case is stark.
You did a claim with no requests for any evidence. Further, when evidence was provided, you ignored.