Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Topic OP
Rarity's Sockpuppets and Masters
by
augustocroppo
on 23/10/2012, 23:04:45 UTC
Rarity's sockpuppet:

Quote
Name: MiloSmith
Posts: 23
Position: Jr. Member
Date Registered: 14-10-2012, 00:13:30
Last Active: Today at 17:56:28

This user produced irrelevant posts in the newbie section and immediately started to post in the next threads:

Economy > Trading Discussion > Scam Accusations > Scammer: Dank

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=117590.msg1290469#msg1290469

Yes, Rarity was clearly right.  It's somewhat inexplicable dank has escaped the scammer tag here. (...)

(...) A scam attempt, clearly.  That he has not received the tag is baffling to me.  It is also baffling that he is allowed to derail this serious discussion with discussions of spiritual healing and drugs while the wronged party is apparently being mocked by individuals such as Psy for some reason.

Economy > Marketplace > Lending > Long-term offers >  International Karmic Bitcoin Bank of Ponyville- Free Toasters! 10% weekly!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119703.msg1290492#msg1290492

(...)

I am posting here as the newest investor of 250 BTC at the request of Mr. Von Pahnzi to talk about my experience with the karmic interview and to assure everyone that it is a positive and enlightening experience that I am sure you will find assures you of the spiritual and financial compatibility with the Pony Bank.

Other > Meta > Censorship on Bitcointalk

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=118154.msg1290539#msg1290539

You have zero evidence Rarity is a troll, only speculation.  Rarity appears to me to be a fan of Bitcoin and a long time member here who never trolled.   This "Something Awful" site is behind a paywall, the only way you could possibly see what is happening there is if you yourself are a member.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=118154.msg1293174#msg1293174

I think it's kind of ironic some of the obvious excuses trotted out to ban Rarity have tripped all over themselves and become nonsense.

For instance, it has been suggested that Rarity should be banned because his request to have the written agreement he made with dank honored was considered a "mockery" and that he should be banned because he is a "Something Awful" troll.

(...)

I am an SA member, joined to get to the bottom of this, and the truth is that Dank is the actual SA troll in this situation.  He has even admitted it, though there is no such evidence for Rarity aside from speculation.

If any of these excuses aimed at Rarity were true and just reasons to ban, he would still be here and the real SA troll who mocks our proud scammer tag tradition would be gone.

Economy > Trading Discussion > Scam Accusations > Nefario

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=115669.msg1291078#msg1291078

As it was organized, it was an illegal securities trading market.  Generally, the government isn't going to care about the company rules involved when they are deciding who will go to jail.  That's one of the drawbacks with illegal business, hard to get the government to enforce your contracts.

Other > Off-topic > [To Theymos] Why was Goat banned?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=120102.msg1293123#msg1293123

The censorship is getting absolutely out of control, you need to be aware that by posting this question you are at risk of being banned.

Check out here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=118154.0

User Rarity was banned for criticizing Theymos.  Dancing Dan posted a thread asking for discussion about this and was banned for it as well. The Iron Curtain is falling on Bitcointalk, we must all watch what we say around Dear Leader Theymos and his Central Committee of yes-men.  If I stop posting on these forums soon, it means I was banned for pointing this out too.